Azure vs. Amazon Services: Basic Comparison

By 14th June 2017 October 25th, 2019 cloud computing, cloud migration, Database Cloud Service


While AWS was the principal real player in the cloud computing space, IT professionals for the most part concur Azure has to a great extent shut the gap. In any case, it’s as yet a familiar way of thinking that AWS keeps up a lead for companies that need to run “web scale” applications that support many users. Broadly, famous services, for example, Netflix and Airbnb utilize AWS EC2 to give their services to their clients over the globe.

On other hand, numerous IT geniuses say Azure is simpler to use out-of-the-container and more easy to use, particularly for Windows administrators in littler companies who use cloud servers to supplant their local machines and do not need to host highly accessible applications. Moreover, the simplicity of integration and setup of Azure virtual machines with other Microsoft product makes the move to cloud infrastructure smoother for some.

So, both vendors continuously enhance their offerings, including new abilities and bringing down costs constantly, so comparing one versus the other is to some degree a moving target. Here is what they have said:

Cost: Both the providers offer various differently sized examples which states a relative comparable price point to fit the necessities of organisation of all sizes. Azure incorporate fixed storage, however with AWS, you’ll have to buy storage, separately at an extra cost. All things considered, numerous IT professionals agree to it that AWS storage is very customisable to their requirements which is positive, however the pricing is not as direct as Azure.

Support Plan: Microsoft and Amazon both offer distinctive levels of technical support, which depends upon how quick you need your issues settled or if you require a technical support or dedicated account manager for integration with third party-plugin, if something turns out badly. One major difference is that Azure support charges on the basis of flat monthly fees, yet AWS support expenses are charged on sliding scale fixing to month to month use, so support expenses can raise quickly if you are a substantial and heavy user.

Reliability and uptime: Both Azure and AWS take a stab at greater than 99.95% accessibility, with every provider, giving credit back to clients if uptime drops down under that figure. While both services have been solid, both have encountered occasional blackouts that affects well known services like Netflix, Office 365, and that’s just the beginning.

Setup and ease of use: Azure is known for being advantageous for Windows administrators since they don’t need to learn about new platforms. Azure makes it easy to coordinate on-premises Windows servers with cloud instances to make a hybrid cloud condition.

Then again, AWS is known for giving more configurable, full of feature offerings that has a touch of a rising learning curve. In any case, once you are familiar with the platform, IT aces would agree that AWS offers a considerable measure of power, adaptability and space for customisation with support for huge amount of third party assistance.


About admin